Print

Print


Check out  vCard at  http://www.imc.org/ 

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Alan Arnold [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent:	Tuesday, July 21, 1998 6:37 AM
> To:	[log in to unmask]
> Subject:	schema for human (resource) discovery?
> 
> As Peter Winn has raised the issue of metadata that enhances the
> discovery
> of humans,  I'd like to explore a little further (despite the fact
> that it
> necessitates me thinking of my colleagues as "resources" :-(
> 
> I am investigating the creation and maintenance of a database of
> Australian
> chemists (or chemically-interested persons ;-).  Is there already a
> recognised schema out there for the description of personnel?  Despite
> Simon Cox's reply to Peter, I'm not yet clear whether DC is
> appropriate or
> not.  It would be very convenient if it was because we have good tools
> to
> create and manage DC metadata.
> 
> At 9:05 AM +0800 on 21/7/98,Simon Cox wrote in reply to Peter Winn:
> 
> >Peter - I think that there is a major flaw in your example,
> >concerning the DC.Identifier elements.  Your example metadata
> >purports to describe a person, whereas the identifiers that
> >you give identify
> >1.  a web page
> >2.  an e-mail address.
> >
> >Neither the web-page or e-mail address are identifiers for
> >instantiations of Stu.  Arguably, they are resources in their
> >own right.  The 1:1 principle, which was extensively discussed
> >at DC-5, asserts the notion that DC metadata should refer to
> >a single specific instantiation of a resource.
> >"Identifier" should really be some kind of unique code for
> >the resource itself.  Better examples in the case of a person
> >might be SSN, TFN, etc.
> >
> >However, pursuing this line a little further, while the web-page
> >is relatively easy to describe in DC, the e-mail address is
> >trickier (I guess, if pushed, I'd suggest it could be
> >DC.Type="interactive" since it only has meaning when interacted
> >with, but I'm not real confident here).  Furthermore, both
> >of these resources are clearly _related_ to Stu-the-person,
> >and thus it should be possible to provide pointers between the
> >metadata for each and Stu-the-person using DC.Relation.  I wonder
> >what Relation-type should be used?  For the web-page either
> >"IsBasedOn/IsBasisFor" or "References/IsReferencedBy".  However,
> >for the e-mail address it is not at all clear.
> >The choices are (see Relation working-group report [1] )
> >
> >IsPartOf/HasPart
> >IsVersionOf/HasVersion
> >IsFormatOf/HasFormat
> >References/IsReferencedBy
> >IsBasedOn/IsBasisFor
> >Requires/IsRequiredBy
> >
> >Given the two problems described here for e-mail address
> >(which DC.Type? and which DC.Relation-type wrt the person)
> >maybe I've argued all the way back around to e-mail address
> >actually being a valid "identifier" for a person.
> >Doesn't feel quite right.
> >
> >Comments, anyone.  (esp. David, Misha?)
> >
> >(yr values for DC.Subject are a little wierd too - they are not
> >really keywords applicable to Stu-the-person - perhaps the
> >contents of his mind, but ...)
> >
> >[1] http://purl.oclc.org/metadata/dublin_core/wrelationdraft.html
> >
> >
> >[log in to unmask] wrote:
> >>
> >> DC.Title = "Weibel,  Stu"
> >> DC.Type = "Physical Object"
> >> DC.Identifier = "http://www.oclc.org:5047/~weibel/" SCHEME="URL"
> >> DC.Identifier = "[log in to unmask]" SCHEME = "Email Address"
> >> DC.Subject = "Dublin Core, Metadata, OCLC, IETF, HTML, URI, IW3C2,
> ALCTS,
> >> ..."
> >> DC.Date = "nnnn-nn-nn /" (Stu's Birthday)
> >> ...
> >--
> >__________________________________________________
> >Dr Simon Cox - Australian Geodynamics Cooperative Research Centre
> >CSIRO Exploration & Mining, PO Box 437, Nedlands, WA 6009 Australia
> >T:  +61 8 9389 8421   F:  +61 8 9389 1906   [log in to unmask]
> >http://www.ned.dem.csiro.au/SimonCox/
> 
> 
> ___________________________________________________________________
> Alan Arnold,  School of Chemistry and
> Director of Flexible Education, University College (UNSW)
> Australian Defence Force Academy,  CANBERRA  ACT 2600 Australia
> voice:+61 2 6268 8080  fax:+61 2 6268 8002 web:
> http://www.ch.adfa.oz.au/apa/
> 
>