At 08:13 AM 1/28/98 -0500, Jul,Erik wrote:
>List Readers:
>
>I wonder if we are of one mind regarding DC-Simple, which I understand
>to mean the set of fifteen Dublin Core elements and their definitions.
>
>All other additions would belong to some version of DC-"whatever," but
>*not* DC-Simple.
I *strongly* agree with Erik on this point. I think we should have
schemas like:
Dublin/Core - the 15. (And it should mention LANG, SCHEME, ... for
syntaxes that don't provide native support for such things.
RDF has other ways of expressing those concepts.)
Dublin/Relation - The family of relations from David Bearman's group
Dublin/Type - The resource types (e.g. Text.Thesis.Doctoral) that
we agreed on earlier.
etc.
Ron Daniel Jr. voice:+1 505 665 0597
Advanced Computing Lab fax:+1 505 665 4939
MS B287 email:[log in to unmask]
Los Alamos National Lab http://www.acl.lanl.gov/~rdaniel
Los Alamos, NM, USA, 87545
