Print

Print


You may be interested in a new report by the Australian Bureau of Transport
Economics, URBAN TRANSPORT MODELS: A REVIEW, Working Paper 39. It is
available for free by email ([log in to unmask]) or website
(www.dot.gov.au/programs/bte/bethome.htm).

The report includes a comparative analysis of various transport models
covering four major categories: four-step, behavioral travel demand, linked
urban land use-transport models, and integrated urban land
use-transportation models. It finds that each type has strengths and
weaknesses. The analysis concludes that integrated land use-transport
models incorporating behavioral relationships are most accurate. It seems
to be an good overview of available models.

I am rather less impressed by another Bureau report, FORECASTING LIGHT
VEHICLE TRAFFIC, Working Paper 38, which uses a simple model to predict
future vehicle travel and congestion based on population, vehicle
ownership, per vehicle annual VKT trends. It fails to include any pricing
factors (what if fuel prices increase in real terms in the future?),
congestion (urban roads tend to achieve a self-limiting equilibrium as
congestion increases), or TDM measures (per-capita vehicle travel varies
significantly depending on a variety of local land use, pricing, and travel
choice factors). There is a danger that such models create self-fulfilling
prophecies by predicting vehicle travel growth which is used to justify
increased road capacity, which leads to increased vehicle travel.


Sincerely,

Todd Litman, Director
Victoria Transport Policy Institute
"Efficiency - Equity - Clarity"
1250 Rudlin Street
Victoria, BC, V8V 3R7, Canada
Phone & Fax: 250-360-1560
E-mail:      [log in to unmask]
Website:     www.islandnet.com/~litman



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%