Print

Print


Hi Roger,

think you missed the point.
Does all language not contain and reveal 'feelings'?
Is 'language' construction not a sign for sentience?
Does sentience not include what you might call
"feeling" (a truly 'great' example of vacuous pop -
now's there's high and low out on a bender),
at every moment and between moments?

Surely you can't be so glum as to missread irony
when it's larded on so conspicuously heavily.

If anybody unequivocally 'believes' what they read
especially today, then we really are in 'deep' trouble.
(there it is again)

love and love (and again)
cris (again)

ps, where are 'you' in all this language? where am 'i'?
hello . . . erm  - like, humour or

what do you actually, really 'feel' Roger? and then, why?




%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%