Meta2 Subscribers.....
Perhaps you can direct me to a different forum regarding current DC syntax
and other practical implementation issues. However, please advise by
personal correspondence or to the list if the following are DC "compliant"
and where the current authoritative online reference for these issues are.
Shouldn't one of the purposes of the Helsinki conference be to make the
process more accessible? For example, an authoritative and constantly
updated homepage? ...with admiration, gary malet
Medline Publication Type DC Resource Type
______________________ ______________________
(A) Bibliographies META NAME="DC.type.text.brieftext"
CONTENT="Bibliographies"
(B) Clinical Conference META NAME="DC.type.text"
CONTENT="SCHEME=MedMetadata)Clinical Trial"
(C) Clinical Trial META NAME="DC.type.text" CONTENT="Clinical Trial"
(D) Multicenter Study META NAME="DC.type.text.depthtext"
CONTENT="(SCHEME=MedMetadata)Multicenter Study"
