> Date sent: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 11:04:33 -0500 (EST) > From: Thomas Izbicki <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: Muslim views of Scripture > To: [log in to unmask] > Send reply to: [log in to unmask] > Christian polemics against Islam addressed questions of the nature of the > Koran; see Kritzeck, Peter the Venerable and Islam, also the works of > Norman Daniel and R. W. Southern on this topic. > > tom izbicki > Peter the Venerable is arguably the key medieval figure in Christian attempts to understand Islam, though I would be somewhat wary of Kritzeck's book. Valuable as it is, it is rather dated now, and many of his theories don't hold up. Principal among these is the notion that Peter had a genuine love and respect for Muslims, and sought to convert them, rather than supporting the crusades. It may look this way on the surface, but the purpose of his refutation of Islam, which begins with the famous lines, "I attack you, not with arms [...] but with words, etc." is not to engender goodwill. Indeed, his address to Muslims never reached a Muslim audience. Kedar has convincingly proposed in "Crusade and Mission" that this was a formula borrowed from the apology of al-Kindi, which uses similar wording, and was also available in Spain. I have my own ideas about what else it might mean, but you'll have to read my PhD thesis for that! Virginia Berry has shown long ago ("Petrus Venerabilis") that Peter was an enthusiastic supporter of crusading, especially of the idea of taking revenge on the Greeks for their supposed treachery during the disastrous Second Crusade. Kritzeck has read the concilliatory passages out of context. The main purpose behind Ketton's translation of the Qur'an was to provide an accurate source of information for which a refutation might be created. While reasonably accurate, it is not a sympathetic translation, and contains numerous commentaries such as "note how he (Muhammad) repeats himself again here". Ketton, Peter, and their contemporaries came to view the Qur'an as a hopeless mess, a confused mixture of biblical passages with much new heretical material and no sturcture, which gave them all the more reason for wanting to refute Islam as a heresy. Tim Rayborn %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%