Print

Print


Jim'll writes:

> I understood Stu to mean that there was a simple, default representation
> which didn't make use of sub-elements to qualify the element values.  In
> this case the element value's interpretation would be fixed (and probably
> the most common/popular/easily understood interpretation).  For example in
> the default case the Author element's value would be the author's name.
> If you wanted to be flash and include more sophisticated information about
> the author, you'll need to use sub-elements to qualify the additional
> Author elements (things like email addresses, phone numbers, postal
> addresses, etc).  I know canonical!=default but that was the only
> interpretation that seemed to make sense to me.  Was this the correct
> interpretation Stu or did you mean something else?

Jon's interpretation of my intent is correct

stu