Jim'll writes: > I understood Stu to mean that there was a simple, default representation > which didn't make use of sub-elements to qualify the element values. In > this case the element value's interpretation would be fixed (and probably > the most common/popular/easily understood interpretation). For example in > the default case the Author element's value would be the author's name. > If you wanted to be flash and include more sophisticated information about > the author, you'll need to use sub-elements to qualify the additional > Author elements (things like email addresses, phone numbers, postal > addresses, etc). I know canonical!=default but that was the only > interpretation that seemed to make sense to me. Was this the correct > interpretation Stu or did you mean something else? Jon's interpretation of my intent is correct stu