 |
 |
> >>Data manipulation - is the logic capable of handling 2000AD as a leap year > >>etc. > > > >The year 2000 is not a leap year. > > Sorry to be a pedant, but yes it is. Centuries divisible by 4 are not, > centuries divisible by 400 are. Of course I could really annoy everyone > by also pointing out that the year 2000 is not the start of the 21st > century! <grin> > I thought all centuries were not leap years but milleniums are. Are there other variations? Stuart ************************************************************************** Stuart Skeates [log in to unmask] General Medical Practitioner PGP ID: 102AB451: 58 A1 3A D4 30 54 E2 17 5D E7 84 79 42 8B 79 D1 ************************************************************************** %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%