 |
 |
James Kennedy (or someone pretending to be him) said: > [..snip..] > > I do however sympathize with colleagues who feel uncomfortable > discussing some topics in the presence of legal experts as they may feel > their comments could be mis-construed, or brought up in evidence against > them at a latter date. > > [..snip..] > > 1) treat the list as a private discussion whose members should not be > held to account outside this forum for their musings in the forum (A > kind of discussion group parliamentary privilege) > > [..snip..] Just in case anyone on this list should be worrying about the legal implications of what they say here; or just in case anyone should wish to bring legal action based on what is said here: it is perhaps worth remembering that e-mail is very easy to forge. There is no guarantee that the e-mail I'm replying to was written by James Kennedy, nor that the e-mail you're reading was written by Martin McCarthy. If someone on this list says something that they later regret saying... well...who's to say it was them who *really* said it in the first place? (So PGP users might not want to pgp-sign their postings when they're saying something of negligable legality [grin]). Martin -- Martin McCarthy /</ [log in to unmask] PGP key available. \>\ [log in to unmask] Multi-User Virtual Reality -- /</ http://www.hermetica.com/marty see http://www.hermetica.com/nexus \>\ %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%