In message <[log in to unmask]>, Dr David J
Plews <[log in to unmask]> writes
>At 20:31 28/09/1996 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>In message <[log in to unmask]>, Stephen J Doyle
>><[log in to unmask]> writes
>>>I have just joined a small practice of 1 and 1/2 doctors (I am the half and
>>>the other one is a husband and wife job-share) which is not computerised. We
>>>want to computerise this year, and I would like advice from the group as to
>>>which they think is the most appropriate system. EMIS seems to be a popular
>>>choice of many. Opinions please. We only get 50% re-inbursement as we are
>>>not fund holding.
>>
>>Stephen,
>Before you go any further *check* that your HA actually *has* any money for
>GP computers. If they have, check if they will consider your practice for
>reimbursement, to what amount of total, etc. Get it all in *writing*.
>
>Rotherham HA steadfastly maintains that the NHSE and Treasury have not
>agreed on any monies for GP computers for this financial year.
>We live in hope :-(
I thought that computer money had been included in the general pool ,
i.e. was there but not identifiable. or ringfenced.
What happened to the supposedly extra money for Links?
Mary
>
>--------------------------
>Dr David J Plews
>email: [log in to unmask]
>
--
Mary Hawking
Kingsbury Court Surgery
Church Street
Dunstable
Beds LU5 4RS
tel:01582 601289 (home)
01582 663218 (surgery)
fax:01582 476488 (surgery)
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
