Print

Print


Someone on the newsgroup uk.misc wrote:

> In article <[log in to unmask]>, Richard Buttrey
> <[log in to unmask]> writes
> >[log in to unmask] (Paul Burridge) wrote:

> >>There was a report on the TV news over the weekend that stated that
> >>some astronomical figure (approaching 500,000,000 Pounds) had been
> >>spunked by the government on consultancy fees for previously planned
> >>but now defunct computer projects.

> >I too heard this *news* on R4 over the weekend. What interests me though
> >is that this was trumpeted as the result of some fundamental new research
> >by the boys and girls of the BBC.

> >What was their motive since I remember reading and hearing about the
> >Wessex Area Health Authority debacle with their computer systems some
> >three years ago? This hardly amounts to news I would have thought.

> I spent 2 years on one of the HISS projects, its was easy to see what
> was going on from the start. The NHS set up this management executive
> thing to promote it etc in the Heath service, unfortunately they didnt
> bother employing anyone that was any good <g> The hospitals slavishly
> followed the recommendations of the executive, the appaling CBS model
> and the now infamous read codes, which I think was invented by someone
> for a laugh <g> a coding system that can describe everything in the
> universe and a few other things too but at the same time is totally
> unusable in real life.
>
> The projects themselves were badly managed, it seems the NHS thinks it
> can get computer systems on the cheap, you pay peanuts ..... But we did
> deliver on time and on budget and to the contract, cant say fairer than
> that.
>
> Its such a pity as here is this huge organisation that could really do
> with a streamlined efficient administrative system, that would save
> millons each year.
>
> We all learn from our mistakes, sadly the NHS doesnt seem to bother.


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%