 |
 |
Warning: This message has had one
or more attachments removed (msg-24457-65.html). Please read the "FA-ULISBOA-Attachment-Warning.txt"
attachment(s) for more information.
Hi again
I use depthmapx 0.8 the latest version which was released and also i try with two PC even with ver 6.0 . I put it to be run with 0.35 too. I will update you about the time and ressults.
Momen
Quoting "Varoudis, Tasos" <[log in to unmask]>:
Which version do you use?
Try using 035net maybe and tell me if it feels faster.Tasos
On 12 Oct 2021, at 16:28, Momen FoadMarashi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:Dear Tasos
I am not pretty sure about changing the analysis method is the best solution. although I have to do that or changing the method in some parts.
since the size of the area and more than that the fabric is ,more or less, the in most parts are same , and the calculation for area of on global measure was done easily. it becomes strange.
reducing the size is a good Idea, but for a square or the its surroundings, I think it cannot be smaller than what I select. but I am trying to redefine that.
Thank you for your message.
I also looking forward to the other responds and suggestions.
Bests.
Momen
To unsubscribe from the SPACESYNTAX list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=SPACESYNTAX&A=1
To unsubscribe from the SPACESYNTAX list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=SPACESYNTAX&A=1