Hi Everybody,

Thanks Janice, for bringing the AWE website into de discussion. I like their approach very much, and I use it on my course, but I am not an English native speaking person and my research is not related to writing. As much as I like the idea of having some rules to use the Sentence connectors, I would like to know how much I can rely on their explanations about the signposts. Someone could comment on that, please.

Best wishes
 
Marcelo Bispo de Jesus
Assistant Professor  
University of Campinas
Department of Biochemistry and Tecidual Biology
 
p: +55 19 35216149 






Bispo

On 26 May 2020, at 00:31, Janice Pinder <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

I find discussion topic-comment sentence structure and topic focus techniques is useful. I often refer students to the relevant parts of the now old but still wonderful AWE website, e.g.  http://sana.aalto.fi/awe/cohesion/infostrux/flow/index.html

-- 

JANICE PINDER
Learning skills adviser

Monash University
Library
44 Exhibition Walk, 
Clayton campus, VIC 3800
Australia

T:  +61 3 9905 1470
E: [log in to unmask]
monash.edu

CRICOS Provider: Monash University 00008C/01857J


We acknowledge and pay respects to the Elders and Traditional Owners of the land on which our four Australian campuses stand. Information for Indigenous Australians


Please note that my usual working days are Monday, Tuesday and Thursday
I am currently working from home. You can reach me during business hours from 9am-5pm M-F via my office number (I check my messages twice a day), Zoom or Google Hangouts.



On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 00:13, Susan Mitchell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hi Everyone,

 

Many thanks for all your extremely interesting replies. Perhaps the most fascinating thing is just how passionate we all are about the work we do.

 

I thought I would move the discussion on (unless people want to discuss the previous topics further) to getting academic text to flow and to have direction.

 

I usually advise the occasional use of anadiplosis where a word or phrase appears at the end of one sentence and the beginning of the next.

 

Thus:

 

Without anadiplosis

 

Several approaches are required to solve this problem.  There are lots of apparent differences with these approaches but they are all qualitative and this is what they have in common.

 

With anadiplosis

 

To solve this problem we require several approachesThese approaches appear to be very different but they have one thing in common – they are all qualitative.

 

Another use of anadiplosis is that it allows the writer to discuss something in further detail. (In the previous anadiplitic sentence we are not only told that there are several approaches but also something about them.)

 

I find that if writers never discuss anything in any more detail than anything else the writing becomes quite flat. Nothing stands out and nothing grabs the readers’ interest.

 

Do you all advise using anadiplosis or do you have other techniques to improve flow?

 

With very best wishes,

 

Susan

_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe login to https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=EATAW You find the 'Unsubscribe' button in the blue 'Options bar'
_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe login to https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=EATAW You find the 'Unsubscribe' button in the blue 'Options bar'

_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe login to https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=EATAW You find the 'Unsubscribe' button in the blue 'Options bar'