Marcelo Bispo de Jesus Assistant Professor University of Campinas Department of Biochemistry and Tecidual Biology p: +55 19 35216149 |
On 26 May 2020, at 00:31, Janice Pinder <[log in to unmask]> wrote:I find discussion topic-comment sentence structure and topic focus techniques is useful. I often refer students to the relevant parts of the now old but still wonderful AWE website, e.g. http://sana.aalto.fi/awe/cohesion/infostrux/flow/index.html--
JANICE PINDER
Learning skills adviserMonash University
Library
44 Exhibition Walk,
Clayton campus, VIC 3800
AustraliaT: +61 3 9905 1470
E: [log in to unmask]
monash.edu
CRICOS Provider: Monash University 00008C/01857JWe acknowledge and pay respects to the Elders and Traditional Owners of the land on which our four Australian campuses stand. Information for Indigenous Australians
Please note that my usual working days are Monday, Tuesday and ThursdayI am currently working from home. You can reach me during business hours from 9am-5pm M-F via my office number (I check my messages twice a day), Zoom or Google Hangouts._________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe login to https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=EATAW You find the 'Unsubscribe' button in the blue 'Options bar'_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe login to https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=EATAW You find the 'Unsubscribe' button in the blue 'Options bar'Hi Everyone,
Many thanks for all your extremely interesting replies. Perhaps the most fascinating thing is just how passionate we all are about the work we do.
I thought I would move the discussion on (unless people want to discuss the previous topics further) to getting academic text to flow and to have direction.
I usually advise the occasional use of anadiplosis where a word or phrase appears at the end of one sentence and the beginning of the next.
Thus:
Without anadiplosis
Several approaches are required to solve this problem. There are lots of apparent differences with these approaches but they are all qualitative and this is what they have in common.
With anadiplosis
To solve this problem we require several approaches. These approaches appear to be very different but they have one thing in common – they are all qualitative.
Another use of anadiplosis is that it allows the writer to discuss something in further detail. (In the previous anadiplitic sentence we are not only told that there are several approaches but also something about them.)
I find that if writers never discuss anything in any more detail than anything else the writing becomes quite flat. Nothing stands out and nothing grabs the readers’ interest.
Do you all advise using anadiplosis or do you have other techniques to improve flow?
With very best wishes,
Susan