Print

Print


I think the issue here is that the probability of a functional mutation, or change ,in the RNA, increases as the number or organisms infected increases.

Since this may wind up infecting hundreds of millions of people, it would appear that there are plenty of opportunities for "mutation", however one might want to define that term.



Thomas Cox PhD RN
[log in to unmask]


On Wednesday, March 25, 2020, 11:21:35 PM EDT, John Whittington <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


At 02:20 26/03/2020, Wendy Olsen wrote:
I urge you to realise the virusreplicates itself as particles splitting off from particles. The wordmutation here refers to a change in the genetic sequence.

Unless biology has changed since I was taught about it (it feels like 100years ago!), viruses do not, and cannot, replicate by 'splitting' (that'ssomething that only some living micro-organisms, like bacteria,can do).  Instead they 'take over' the  target host cells (e.g.those in an infected human) and 'instruct' those cells to manufacturevirus particles.

I don't know, but I can but presume that viral mutation occurs when thatmanufacturing process in the host cells goes a bit wrong, resulting inthe manufacture of virus particles with a slightly changedgenome.

Virus are not living things by any normal definition, and therefore arenot subject to many of the influences that can affect livingcells/organisms, but (again I haven't got a clue!) it's possible thatphysical influences (like radiation) can do 'damaging' things to thestructure of the RNA (or DNA) of the virus

Kind Regards,


John

----------------------------------------------------------------
Dr John Whittington,      Voice:    +44 (0) 1296 730225
Mediscience Services      Fax:      +44 (0) 1296 738893
Twyford Manor, Twyford,    E-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Buckingham  MK18 4EL,UK            
----------------------------------------------------------------******************************************************Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button yourmessage will go only to the sender of this message.If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automaticallyto [log in to unmask]: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk.*******************************************************
****************************************************** Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your message will go only to the sender of this message. If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's 'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically to [log in to unmask] Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk. *******************************************************