 |
 |
Hi Steve, standard bare metal WNs. This is no a VM problem. cheers alessandra On 26/02/2020 11:25, sjones wrote: > Hi Alessandra, > > What type of WN is doing it? When we last ran VAC (a while back now) I > seem to recall that we had a local squid cache on each WN, pointing > back to another single site squid that did the real work and hence > limited traffic further back, since it had a large cache. Could it be > that WNs at VAC sites go direct to CERN, ? > > Just asking... > > Ste > > > > > On 2020-02-26 09:10, Alessandra Forti wrote: >>> it seems there is a problem with the UK sites WNs accessing frontier >>> squid. In particular Manchester, RAL, RALPP and Oxford the others >>> too but they are behind a NAT and not as many nodes appear in the list. >>> >>> >> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwlcg-squid-monitor.cern.ch%2Fawstats%2Fbin%2Fawstats.pl%3Fconfig%3Dcvmfsbproxy.cern.ch%26databasebreak%3Dday%26day%3D25&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cebdecf99190248c3600a08d7ba941a8f%7C569df091b01340e386eebd9cb9e25814%7C0%7C0%7C637183017572955219&sdata=tri9QzQT0sN%2BJAO1jlmf0X21X3yQ%2Bo%2BTdTnD%2BEVcZhM%3D&reserved=0 >> >>> >>> you need to filter for ac.uk >>> >>> Can I ask what version of squid you are using and if you are using >>> frontier squid or standard OS squid? >>> >>> Frontier changed the baseline from 3.5.28 to 4.10.1-1 two weeks ago >>> which is not even available on centos8. >>> > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the TB-SUPPORT list, click the following link: > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=TB-SUPPORT&A=1 -- Inference: a conclusion reached on the basis of evidence and reasoning Respect is a rational process. \\// For Ur-Fascism, disagreement is treason. (U. Eco) ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the TB-SUPPORT list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=TB-SUPPORT&A=1