 |
 |
Dear Almu,
were your data collected at a synchrotron? Many synchrotrons run automatic processing of the data being collected and it is worth looking if there is some processing directory between
the frames you collected. If so, these data may already be quite decent, and in any case, the XDS.INP file may tell you how to set the optimal processing parameters for this particular beamline.
You can also look at the refined parameters of your successful XDS run, especially the ORGX and ORGY. Try to rerun XDS, using the refined parameters of the successful run.
Good luck!
Herman
Von: CCP4 bulletin board <[log in to unmask]> Im Auftrag von
Almudena Ponce Salvatierra
Gesendet: Freitag, 29. November 2019 12:48
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: [EXTERNAL] [ccp4bb] 8/ 2263 spots indexed XDS
EXTERNAL : Real sender is
[log in to unmask]
Dear all,
I have some data sets that don't want to be processed :p
In one of them, when I look at IDXREF.LP I see virtually none of the found spots were indexed and the reason is that they are "too far from the expected position". The spots are smeary and elongated, so not the prettiest.
I have managed to process so far only one data set with decent statistics from another crystal harvested from the same drop, where the diffraction spots look better.
I am trying to find in the xds wiki the keyword I should fine tune in order to make those spots indexable.
Could you help me please?
Thank you very much in advance.
Best wishes,
Almu
To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1