Print

Print


It is open for review
Please do send comments


Please text me for urgent contact 07713743150
Sent from my iPhone
Professor Jane Sandall
King’s College, London
[log in to unmask]


On 18 Oct 2019, at 14:18, Macfarlane, Alison <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


I am going to review it, but it is an open consultation, so anyone can respond, I think.

Ali

From: The normal birth research list <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Soo Downe
Sent: 18 October 2019 12:36
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: *Correction*: Peer Review of RCOG Scientific Impact Paper: Clinical Impacts of the Relationship Between Social Determinants and Maternal Outcomes

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organisation. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and believe the content to be safe.

i havent seen it Alison... if it makes the implications you have noted, it should definitely be queried robustly...

All the best

Soo
________________________________
From: The normal birth research list <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on behalf of Macfarlane, Alison <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 12:10 PM
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Subject: FW: *Correction*: Peer Review of RCOG Scientific Impact Paper: Clinical Impacts of the Relationship Between Social Determinants and Maternal Outcomes


Has anyone else received this? I thought it was just a peer review request, but it turns out that it’s a consultation closing on Monday.



It looks worrying as it is based heavily on MBRRACEmaternal death reports and looks like it implies that anyone with a risk factor is at high risk of maternal death. It also seems a wee bit over optimistic about what antenatal care can achieve.



Alison



From: Ayanmohammud Ali <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Sent: 24 September 2019 10:15
To: Macfarlane, Alison <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Subject: *Correction*: Peer Review of RCOG Scientific Impact Paper: Clinical Impacts of the Relationship Between Social Determinants and Maternal Outcomes



CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organisation. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and believe the content to be safe.



Dear Professor Macfarlane,



Apologies for the second email, please find the correct SIP paper to review below:



Peer Review of RCOG Scientific Impact Paper: Clinical Impacts of the Relationship Between Social Determinants and Maternal Outcomes



The RCOG Scientific Advisory Committee would like to invite you to peer review this paper.



This consultation is now live; could you please respond by midnight on Monday 21st October.



The documents and comments form are here on the RCOG website<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rcog.org.uk%2Fen%2Fguidelines-research-services%2Fguidelines%2Fconsultation-documents%2F&data=01%7C01%7Cjane.sandall%40KCL.AC.UK%7Ccb86cd4e27af4523585108d753cdb9db%7C8370cf1416f34c16b83c724071654356%7C0&sdata=6tmnRoIYgl9rJys5MBctH9N1Orc0Bn%2BgSfB0ucGZHZc%3D&reserved=0>. The comments form requests general feedback on the paper; there are no specific questions to answer.



Your input into this important aspect of our work at the College is greatly appreciated, and we would be delighted if you would help us with this. Scientific Impact Papers advise on developing or controversial scientific issues of relevance to obstetrics and gynaecology, where an evidence base exists but is limited, uncertain or conflicted in nature. They aim to address potential implications to clinical practice and should be understood by the generalist.



We look forward to receiving your highly valuable feedback, and thank you in advance for the important contribution you are making to the College.



Please use the online comments form to give your views, but for any other queries, please email Clinical Effectiveness at [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>.



Yours sincerely



Professor Mark Kilby FRCOG

Chair, Scientific Advisory Committee





________________________________

To unsubscribe from the NORMALBIRTH-RESEARCH list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=NORMALBIRTH-RESEARCH&A=1<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwebadmin%3FSUBED1%3DNORMALBIRTH-RESEARCH%26A%3D1&data=01%7C01%7Cjane.sandall%40KCL.AC.UK%7Ccb86cd4e27af4523585108d753cdb9db%7C8370cf1416f34c16b83c724071654356%7C0&sdata=oQ4aEmNtVqzT3JrWPzNXVJsFg1qYvaFlI5ZAkeE%2FnTY%3D&reserved=0>
[University of Central Lancashire]
Please consider the environment before printing
________________________________

To unsubscribe from the NORMALBIRTH-RESEARCH list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=NORMALBIRTH-RESEARCH&A=1<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwebadmin%3FSUBED1%3DNORMALBIRTH-RESEARCH%26A%3D1&data=01%7C01%7Cjane.sandall%40KCL.AC.UK%7Ccb86cd4e27af4523585108d753cdb9db%7C8370cf1416f34c16b83c724071654356%7C0&sdata=oQ4aEmNtVqzT3JrWPzNXVJsFg1qYvaFlI5ZAkeE%2FnTY%3D&reserved=0>

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the NORMALBIRTH-RESEARCH list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=NORMALBIRTH-RESEARCH&A=1<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwebadmin%3FSUBED1%3DNORMALBIRTH-RESEARCH%26A%3D1&data=01%7C01%7Cjane.sandall%40KCL.AC.UK%7Ccb86cd4e27af4523585108d753cdb9db%7C8370cf1416f34c16b83c724071654356%7C0&sdata=oQ4aEmNtVqzT3JrWPzNXVJsFg1qYvaFlI5ZAkeE%2FnTY%3D&reserved=0>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH&A=1