RELATIVE RISK VERSUS ABSOLUTE RISK
According with the direct intepretation of the Lancet paper,
"Triumphant success of HPV vaccine" https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02026-4
"Hopes raised of cervical cancer eradication" https://www.bbc.com/news/health-48758730

1/
An example of the impact of the relative risk: #HPVvaccine.
See you, decrease relative risk and decrease absolute risk from https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(19)30298-3/fulltext
You have the analysis (and the table) in Spanish in:
http://www.nogracias.org/2019/07/12/presentacion-en-falso-del-exito-triunfal-de-la-vacuna-del-virus-del-papiloma-manipulacion-emocional-y-estadistica-por-juan-gervas/
2/
Anogenital wart diagnoses decreased
GIRLS aged
15–19 years:
relative risk by 67%
absolute risk by 0.21%
20-24 year:
relative risk by 54%;
absolute risk by 0.28%
25-29 years:
relative risk by 31%;
absolute risk by 0,07%.
BOYS aged
15-19 years:
relative risk by 48%;
absolute risk by 0.04%.
20-24 years:
relative risk by 32%;
absolute risk by 0.14%.
3/
After 5–9 years of vaccination, CIN2+ decreased among screened girls aged
15-19 years:
relative risk by 51%
absolute risk by 0.63%
20-24 years:
relative risk by 31%
absolute risk by 0.28%
-un saludo juan gérvas @JuanGrvas

To unsubscribe from the EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH&A=1