It’s implied Patrick, & I think sounds better & tauter without.. but, of course, your call…
Doug
> On Apr 24, 2019, at 9:28 AM, Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Douglas will consider but -for this old head 'and also' follows from his 'and' problem above -yet another ordeal cheers old P
>
> On 24/04/2019 15:54, Douglas Barbour wrote:
>> An intriguingly comic vision of the past (present), Patrick. But I agree with Bill: you don’t need that ‘and also’…
>>
>> Doug
>>
>>> On Apr 24, 2019, at 12:35 AM, Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>> WRITERS BLOCK
>>>
>>> the poet
>>> was sulking
>>> rather frustrated
>>> realising that
>>> writing had not
>>> yet been invented
>>> let alone language
>>>
>>> and
>>> outside
>>> his cave
>>> there was
>>> that mangey
>>> sabre tooth tiger
>>> stalking him
>>>
>>> and also
>>> perhaps he will
>>> have to just
>>> take up wall
>>> painting
>>>
>>>
>>> pmcmanus
>>> s468
Douglas Barbour
[log in to unmask]
https://eclecticruckus.wordpress.com/
Recent publications: (With Sheila E Murphy) Continuations & Continuations 2 (UofAPress).
Recording Dates (Rubicon Press).
Listen. If (UofAPress):
Springtime’s wide
water-
yield
but the field
will return
Lorine Niedecker
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the POETRYETC list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=POETRYETC&A=1
