Print

Print


Yes, it does...

On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 12:07, Julian Macoveanu <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Thanks Anderson. I see that Woo argues for 3.1. Paradigms with complex
> cognitive tasks though, don't really come up to that significance level.
> Does the random field theory hold at 2.3?
>
> Best,
> Julian
>
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, 17.25 Anderson M. Winkler, <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>>  Hi Julian,
>>
>> The default is now 3.1. The paper by Woo et al (Neuroimage, 2014) made a
>> good case for that. I don't think the threshold level was on its own right
>> a cause for increased amount of false positives in any tool that was
>> assessed, although too low thresholds do indeed create problems (the random
>> field theory stops working, for example).
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Anderson
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 05:31, Julian Macoveanu <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear FSL experts,
>>>
>>> In the light of the Eklund papers, I was wondering what is the
>>> recommended cluster forming threshold for group level estimation using the
>>> FLAME1(+2).
>>>
>>> I think the default is z=2.3 and that 80% of FSL papers use this
>>> according to the latest survey doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00016, but
>>> Eklund and others argues for 3.1. However, they use an older FSL
>>> version 5.07 and 5.09 and z=3.1 is more a general recommendation for
>>> least-square based estimations methods, and not sure to what degree it
>>> should applied to FLAME which is a much fancier mixed-effect model
>>> estimation.
>>>
>>> It is easy to recommend a more stringent CFT, but 3.1. seems rather
>>> conservative using FLAME and looks to me to result in high false negative
>>> rates.
>>>
>>> The question is, what CFT in the current FSL version should we choose
>>> to get a rate of 5% false positive rate that we want to accept at corrected
>>> p<0.05.
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>> Julian
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link:
>>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link:
>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1
>>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1
>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1