 |
 |
Hi Dave, Looks like there is nothing significant among your results... double check that design and contrasts were entered correctly and, if so, the results are negative. All the best, Anderson On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 04:42, Davide Momi <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Dear FSL experts, > > I'm running TBSS analysis on my dataset. Specifically I have one group of > 22 subjects and I would like to correlate their FA values with a > behavioural measure (RTs of Stroop task). So I've performed randomise as > follow: > > *randomise -i all_FA_skeletonized.-o FA -m mean_FA_skeleton_mask -d > design.mat -t design.con -R -n 500 -T2 -D* > > So in the end, I thresholded the "_tfce_corrp_tstat" image to get the > p<0.05 but I found no clusters that survive at the 1-P=.95 level for > tcfe_corrp_tstat. So I was wondering whether if is there a way to theshold > the uncorrected image "tcfe_p_tstat". > > Do you have any tips > > Thanks > > Dave > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link: > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1