Can I ask for thoughts on the following please.
a) DS complains to ICO re handling of SAR.
b) DPO responds to ICO providing evidence of compliance, and offers further assistance/information to ICO if required.
c) DS makes an un-evidenced allegation against the DPO to the ICO (nothing serious, but nevertheless an allegation casting doubt on the DPO's objectivity/integrity).
d) ICO (without requesting, obtaining or providing any evidence whatsoever) totally bypasses the DPO and makes contact directly with the CEO without the DPO's knowledge.
Happy to elaborate further off list if necessary.
Regards Derek
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/subscribers/subscribercommands.html
Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
