 |
 |
Thanks you Jack and Lesley for sharing your documents and insights. I am eagerly awaiting my students report from the ethics committee for her Doctoral study using action research . Delysia Timm DTech Advisor Special Projects in Office of DVC T&L DUT GATE 1 Berea House Steve Biko Campus 0313732166 -------- Original message -------- From: Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]> Date: 2018/11/09 16:54 (GMT+02:00) To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Ethical issues as action researchers Dear Jane - good to hear from you, but concerned about your experiences with an Ethics Committee. Here is an ethics form that went through last year at the University of Cumbria from Arianna Briganti - one of my doctoral supervisions. Ari has given her permission to share it: http://www.actionresearch.net/writings/ari/arianonethics14-02-17.pdf The links at the bottom, to the consent form and participant information sheet, are not live, but I can send these to you if you would like them. I have been interested for years in the unethical behaviour of ethics committees. My interest began with Geoff Suderman Gladwell's experience. Geoff analysed his experiences in his Masters Dissertation on: The Ethics of Personal, Narrative, Subjective Research. Geoff graduated from Brock University in October, 2001. You can access this at http://www.actionresearch.net/writings/values/gsgma.PDF I think Geoff's Abstract will speak directly to your concerns: Abstract In my work throughout the two years I have spent in a masters program, three themes with respect to research and teaching have continually emerged. These themes are the personal, the subjective and the narrative. When I proposed a project to the Senate Research Ethics Board of Brock University (SREB), it was turned down. The nature of the questions asked by the SREB caused me to reflect upon the nature of the ethical framework that underlies its existence. In this project, I examine the nature of the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, the document that spawned the SREB. I use narratives from my personal experiences both in teaching and in theological education to explain my reactions to the document and the implied world view. I explain why my vision of research and teaching is not compatible with that of the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, and I propose an ethical understanding based on the realities of my understanding of research and teaching. ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the PRACTITIONER-RESEARCHER list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=PRACTITIONER-RESEARCHER&A=1 ________________________________ "This e-mail is subject to our Disclaimer, to view click http://www.dut.ac.za/disclaimer" Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more visit the Mimecast website. ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the PRACTITIONER-RESEARCHER list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=PRACTITIONER-RESEARCHER&A=1