 |
 |
see below
On 11/28/2018 11:03 AM, Constantinos Andreopoulos wrote:
[log in to unmask]" class=""> Well, not sure ReWeight should be tagged as 3.0.2. Keeping the Generator and ReWeight version numbers the same, is not as great idea as it might look. What if we find a bug and need to produce a new ReWeight version? Do we also produce a clone Generator release with a new tag, only so that we can keep tag numbers in sync? Do not like the potential proliferation of tags, without it being warranted by code changes, only so that all products can be kept in sync. What if we consider Comparisons and Tuning too? Do we keep everything in sync, tagging all 4 products together? Or do we introduce variations to the numbering scheme (3.0.2a etc)? Isn’t 3 numbers just enough info for organising releases? What is wrong with a simple table associating supported combinations of products.for now, why not use same number for ReWeight and Generator? Tuning and Comparisons are 3.0.0
so we are close together. As you say, divergences will develop over time. I don't think we want to
synch all 4 products. If we have new major releases about once a year, we will usually be close. I'd
like to hear more opinions.
[log in to unmask]" class="">I'm being careful. We think we have reweighting working. Steven made a script to test allThe goal with the document is that it precedes the release. Not knowing whether more commits will follow today does not sound like a robust starting point for deciding that we have a release tomorrow? Are there residual problems or not?
reweighting tweaks in all tunes and that shows no errors. Robert is renaming splines to match
new names today. I found a potential error yesterday that we are still investigating. That is
as much as I know.
regards,
Steve
[log in to unmask]" class="">cheersC
--Dr. Costas Andreopoulos, FHEAAssociate ProfessorUniversity of Liverpool and STFC/RAL
Sent from my iPhoneGenerator release will be 3.0.2, not sure about ReWeight release.
We should keep numbering similar, how about also using 3.0.2?
Steve
On 11/28/2018 10:26 AM, Steven Dytman wrote:
Robert, Steven G, and I have been making small changes to Generator
and ReWeight.
Some commits have already been made, perhaps more today. Our goal is
to have
new release tomorrow.
We will put together a small document and post it to docdb.
regards,
Steve
On 11/26/2018 10:27 AM, Costas Andreopoulos - UKRI STFC wrote:
Same as always? Guess we are talking strictly about a bug-fix
revision of the Generator (3.0.2) or the first tag of ReWeight
(effectively, a bug-fix revision of what we would have already
released in October had it still been part of the Generator).
So, some documentation of the bug fixes (eg a DocDB document, or info
submitted together with a pull request - whatever is most appropriate
given the scale and scope of changes) + some validation showing the
bug was fixed and nothing else was screwed by mistake. Then we can
take it from there.
C
On 26 Nov 2018, at 16:03, Dytman, Steven A <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
ok, we have important deadline very soon. What is procedure for
agreeing
on a release?
Steve
On 11/26/2018 10:40 AM, Costas Andreopoulos - UKRI STFC wrote:
I can not connect on Wedns. I am teaching and then I am travelling
to IFIC.
C
On 26 Nov 2018, at 14:12, Dytman, Steven A
<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
excellent idea, is that all right with you, Costas?
On 11/26/2018 7:54 AM, Marco Roda wrote:
Hi Steve,
ok, no problem.
Maybe we could use the time slot we had this summer for the tuning: it
was Wednesday at 10 am Chicago time.
Cheers,
Marco
Il giorno lun, 26/11/2018 alle 13.41 +0000, Dytman, Steven A ha
scritto:
There is a significant snow storm in the Chicago area, not sure what
to do.
Researchers here coming back from elsewhere surely have lots of
trouble
yesterday and today. Those of us here have up to 1 ft=30 cm of snow.
Meeting is postponed, but we still have to decide when we are done
with
changes to reweighting. I'm thinking midweek, we'll have to stay in
touch
via email & slack. Steven and I are still doing tests and Robert
was
supposed
to have info on splines early this week.
Steve
#####################################################################
###
To unsubscribe from the NEUTRINO-MC-CORE list, click the following
link:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwebadmin%3FSUBED1%3DNEUTRINO-MC-CORE%26A%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Cdytman%40pitt.edu%7C892f14d4573c4dcd1c5c08d653bc2048%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1%7C0%7C636788464802973660&sdata=gCZNprjdR5tPIivPrWxqr%2F%2FydwuTaMBbyubd7zreA4I%3D&reserved=0
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the NEUTRINO-MC-CORE list, click the following
link:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwebadmin%3FSUBED1%3DNEUTRINO-MC-CORE%26A%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Cdytman%40pitt.edu%7C892f14d4573c4dcd1c5c08d653bc2048%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1%7C0%7C636788464802973660&sdata=gCZNprjdR5tPIivPrWxqr%2F%2FydwuTaMBbyubd7zreA4I%3D&reserved=0
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the NEUTRINO-MC-CORE list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=NEUTRINO-MC-CORE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the NEUTRINO-MC-CORE list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=NEUTRINO-MC-CORE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the NEUTRINO-MC-CORE list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=NEUTRINO-MC-CORE&A=1