Hi Yuwal,

It seems you have 2 treatment groups, and in each group, each participant undergoes 2 levels (pre/post). It's a case for a 2x2 mixed design. It has appeared a number of times in the mailing list. Search for "design_ekaterina.ods" and the comments therein (the more recent ones will have the updated link).

All the best,

Anderson


On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 05:29, Yuval Argaman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Dear FSL experts and community,

I'm but a novice in FSL, and I have a dilemma as in how to define the VBM and TBSS design matrix.

My study design is randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover and counterbalanced.

Each of the 26 participants in my study underwent 4 scans: Pre-Treatment1, Post-Treatment1, Pre-Treatment2 and Post-Treatment2.

Initially, my go-to design was a 2x2 mixed effects ANOVA (2 treatments, 2 timepoints).

However, I'm not sure if this is the correct way to define the design matrix, because the 1-factor X 4 measures might be more appropriate to use, and seems simpler.

Therefore, I'd appreciate your opinion regarding the following questions:

1. Assuming a >=4 weeks washout period between treatments, and a ~2-week interval between scans in each treatment - which of the designs would be more
   appropriate? (I'm also performing a paired t-test to examine carryover effects).

2. Is it necessary to define exchangeability blocks for each subject?

Thanks in advance!

Sincerely,

Yuval.

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1


To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1