Picking up on David's point re: Freire, which seems most pertinent to contemporary conjunctures of integrated crises?: - critical pedagogies and popular education:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_pedagogy
en.wikipedia.org
Critical pedagogy is a philosophy of education and social movement that has developed and applied concepts from critical theory and related traditions to the field of education and the study of culture. Advocates of critical pedagogy view teaching as an inherently
political act, reject the neutrality of knowledge, and insist that issues of social justice and democracy itself are not distinct ...
|
Work like you don't need money
Love like you've never been hurt
and dance like no-one's watching
"Education either functions as an instrument which is used to facilitate integration of the younger generation into the logic of the present system and bring about conformity or it becomes the practice of freedom, the means by
which men and women deal critically and creatively with reality and discover how to participate in the transformation of their world." Paulo Freire (Pedagogy of the Oppressed)
"it is impossible to imagine a future unless we have located ourselves in the present and its history; however, the reverse is also true in that we cannot locate ourselves in the present and its history unless we imagine the future and commit to creating it" (Anna Stetsenko, 2015).
Hello all,
A great question and I think Kay has a good point about the terminology. There's little that's radically different for prevailing norms but I take my guidance from Freire's notion of conscientization and how we must become aware of the problem of the orthodox.
I'll make my points brief:
To unsubscribe from the SEDA list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=SEDA&A=1