 |
 |
Thanks! I just figured it out and I will keep my contrasts and hypothesis throughout the first and second level analyses. Any suggestions on the way of considering some covariates for the third level? I also wrote a post about some SPM data I have, could you suggest me something about it? Thank you a lot, Carlotta. Il Dom 28 Ott 2018, 22:16 Anderson M. Winkler <[log in to unmask]> ha scritto: > Hi Carlotta, > > We shouldn't change the hypotheses based on results we find along the way. > Write your hypotheses on a piece of paper before starting the analyses, > stick it to a wall, and keep them all along... > > All the best, > > Anderson > > > > On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 04:59, Carlotta Fabris <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I've been able to run all the first-level analyses and now I was >> wondering something for the second ones. >> >> I tried to do one second-level analyses just for the first subject and I >> noticed that only contrast 3 gave some activation results. Would it be >> better to include only this contrast in the second-level analyses or is it >> better to keep them all and then use only the third one for the third-level >> analyses? >> >> Thanks, >> Carlotta. >> >> ######################################################################## >> >> To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link: >> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1 >> > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link: > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1