 |
 |
Hi Alberto, There are advantages (and disadvantages) to both methods - the data-driven approach gives group maps that better represent your data set, whereas using pre-defined group maps makes your results more comparable to others which used the same maps. Your suggested approach sounds ok, although you will typically get better results with smooth maps (e.g. group melodic output) than with binary masks or thresholded maps. Cheers, Paul On 20/10/2018, Alberto Inuggi <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > while pressing send...I had an idea. > the neurosynth suggestion was raised by a reviewer that claimed that I > erroneously called my "fronto-parietal networks" as a WM network, and I > should have used the corresponding neurosynth mask instead. > > I will try to mask (make intersection) my pure data driven fronto-parietal > RSN (obtained from dual regression) with the WM neurosynth RSN so I should > be sure(er) that I'm actually investigating WM related functional > connectivity. > does it sound correct ? > > cheers > Alberto > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link: > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1