Print

Print


Cochrane crisis.
“It might have been a headache, but the harm done by expelling Peter is  much greater than any inconvenience caused by scientific debate,”
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06727-0?utm_source=twt_nnc&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=naturenews&sf197859021=1

El mar., 18 sept. 2018 a las 8:42, Richard Hockey (<[log in to unmask]>) escribió:

Some more insight into what happened from Maryanne Demasi.

https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjebmspotlight/2018/09/16/cochrane-a-sinking-ship/

R

 

From: Evidence based health (EBH) <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Juan Gérvas
Sent: Tuesday, 18 September 2018 6:03 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Peter C Gøtzsche, expelled from the Cochrane

 

Cochrane Board Statement.

By way of background, we are a global organization which operates under British law. This Board decision is not about freedom of speech. It is not about scientific debate.

It is not about tolerance of dissent.

It is not about someone being unable to criticize a Cochrane Review.
IT IS ABOUT LETTERS OF COMPLAINT.
https://www.cochrane.org/news/statement-cochranes-governing-board

 

El lun., 17 sept. 2018 a las 21:52, Marcus Tolentino (<[log in to unmask]>) escribió:

"Hey, you wanna hear a good joke?
Nobody speak, nobody get choked"

Run The Jewels


Marcus Tolentino Silva

Professor Adjunto (UFAM | UNISO)

CV Lattes: http://j.mp/marcusts

 

 

Em seg, 17 de set de 2018 às 16:29, Vasiliy Vlassov <[log in to unmask]> escreveu:

With all due respect

to the call for the quietness and politeness, I remind that usually and probably only passionate people act against the misconduct and/or immoral behaviors. The silent/polite majority all the times enjoy the fruits of the actions of whistle blowers et al. Academic people have to educate their self about the hard price paid by the whistle blowers in academic world. It is enough to protect such people and respect their courage, even if they disturb the dead silence of the lab.

VVV

 

On 2018-09-17 17:48, Bill Cayley, Jr wrote:

I appreciate Jim McCormack's thoughts... Evidence based medicine needs to be about discussion of the EVIDENCE. Clearly personal feeling and perspectives come into play in ANY interpretation of information (scientific evidence included) but for the good of all we need to aim for clear, transparent, and (hopefully) dispassionate discussion of the merits of evidence...

 

Tx

 

 

Bill Cayley, Jr, MD MDiv  

Work: 715.286.2270

Pager: 715.838.7940

Mobile: 715.828.4636

 

A cheerful heart is good medicine...  (Proverbs 17:22)

 



-- 
\/.\/.\/.
 
Vasiliy V. Vlassov, MD
President, Society for Evidence Based Medicine, osdm.org
Professor, National Research University Higher School of Economics
e-mail: vlassov[a t]cochrane.ru
Web page https://www.hse.ru/en/org/persons/14527416
snail mail: P.O.Box 13 Moscow 109451 Russia
Phone Russia +7(965)2511021

 


To unsubscribe from the EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH&A=1

 


To unsubscribe from the EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH&A=1

 


To unsubscribe from the EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH&A=1



To unsubscribe from the EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH&A=1



To unsubscribe from the EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH&A=1