Ha hilarious, I take everything the wrong way... "This [is] me" (Cesaire quoted by Joris), but then it is not.

Luke

On 16 June 2018 at 16:44, Jaime Robles <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

There’s an enemy?

J

On Jun 16, 2018, at 6:14 AM, Luke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

I should say would put me in the enemy camp, if I had an ounce of weight etc.

Cheers,

Luke

On 16 June 2018 at 14:02, Luke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

I was looking at Drew's article in Postwar British and Irish Poetry, on neo-modernism. He discusses Jencks' characterization of postmodernism, as an eclectic "transcendence", whereas the "double-coding" off neo-modernism is pluralistic, not eclectic, and cast, by Drew, in terms of renewal. Seems fairly clear that the discussion in the OP, of "masking" the original text, is a transcendence, and so an enemy of neo-modernist process etc. Moreover, I can't retreat from postmodernism via the 'renewal' of the "lyric impulse" (mostly autobiography here), because neo-modernism resists assimilation into those sorts of categories.

Interesting chapter, and I could relate to the problems a reader has in knowing how to approach a text. But, it seems like the question in the OP puts me squarely in the enemy camp?

Luke

​

---

To unsubscribe from the BRITISH-IRISH-POETS list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=BRITISH-IRISH-POETS&A=1

---

To unsubscribe from the BRITISH-IRISH-POETS list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=BRITISH-IRISH-POETS&A=1