Dear Alice,
I recently read your article "The Delicate Art of Dealing with Your Archivist," published in the Journal of Higher Education." I
didn't recognize these people you were writing about, having spent over
ten years now as part of the archives community and watching these
folks doing the many aspects of their work (in addition to just
reference), collecting, preserving, making accessible, and performing a
lot of emotional labor helping us all to think critically about our
documentary heritage. These are the folks spending their professional
lives advocating for transparency among elected officials, amplifying
voices of under-documented folks in the archival record, and developing
practices for holding and providing access to peoples' stories in
ethical ways - all for pretty pitiful salaries. In a time when we are
having discussions about how our work is frequently made invisible by
researchers and writers, you chose to boil us down to a few demeaning
stereotypes, almost none of which acknowledge our intellectual
contributions, and all of which describe our work as a service industry
profession. (Incidentally, I spent many years in the service industry,
working to pay my way through my graduate education that enabled me to
become an archivist, and there's no shame in that work either). There's
so much I could say, so I'll attempt to distill it down to a few
points.