Thanks Marianne, this looks like a really interesting article (it was not second generation citations that I was after on this occasion, but still really helpful to read).
Best wishes
Catherine
Sent: 16 July 2018 11:35
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Secondary citations
Hi Catherine,
I’m not sure if it is relevant, but your question reminded me of a study from 2016: Scientific influence is not always visible: The phenomenon of under-cited influential publications (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157716301900)
Best wishes
Marianne
Marianne Gauffriau
Specialkonsulent
Research Adviser
KUB Forskerservice
Research Support
+4591324968
Det Kgl. Bibliotek
Royal Danish Library
Søren Kierkegaards Plads 1
DK-1221 København K
+45 3347 4747
CVR 2898 8842
EAN 5798 000 795297
From: A bibliometrics discussion list for the Library and Research Community [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Catherine Dack
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 12:08 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Secondary citations
Many thanks, Lizzie,
I must admit to being not entirely clear, still. I'm looking for ways to detect instances where a study might be referred to via a second publication, so that the study is mentioned, but only the second publication is cited in the references. Could metrics pick up that the original study had been mentioned? Assuming that it is a single publication, for simplicity, and I'm looking in Scopus, if I select the single publication and click 'view cited by', then I get a list of citing articles (which are articles mentioned in the references and bibliography?) but I thought that if I then click to view the articles that cite one of these, or a selection, then I would just get another list of articles mentioned in the references of that article, or selection? "Does that make any sense at all?! Apologies if I'm being excessively stupid!
best wishes
Catherine
From: A bibliometrics discussion list for the Library and Research
Community <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Elizabeth Gadd <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: 13 July 2018 16:05
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Secondary citations
Hi Catherine,
Not sure if you’re looking at a single author or publication or a whole swathe? However, you can measure secondary citations in both WoS and Scopus if it’s a small enough set? So in Scopus, run your search and click on ‘View Cited By’ – that gives you first level citations, then click on ‘View Cited By’ again and you’ll get secondary citations. Scopus limits citation sets to 2,000 outputs.
Does that help?
Lizzie
From: A bibliometrics discussion list for the Library and Research Community
<[log in to unmask]>
On Behalf Of Catherine Dack
Sent: 11 July 2018 12:07
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Secondary citations
Does anyone know if there is a way to measure secondary citations? (The discipline in question is Economics.)
Any words of wisdom gratefully received!
Thanks
Catherine
To unsubscribe from the LIS-BIBLIOMETRICS list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=LIS-BIBLIOMETRICS&A=1
To unsubscribe from the LIS-BIBLIOMETRICS list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=LIS-BIBLIOMETRICS&A=1
To unsubscribe from the LIS-BIBLIOMETRICS list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=LIS-BIBLIOMETRICS&A=1
To unsubscribe from the LIS-BIBLIOMETRICS list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=LIS-BIBLIOMETRICS&A=1