Hi, I’ve noticed this too following a recent comparison across manufacturers. Roche seem to be stand-alone by using this nomenclature, which they have determined using a different procedure (n=21, within run
imprecision) to that which they use to define LOD (n=60 of the blank + 2SDs of low conc. sample, CLSI approach essentially). I don’t find this additional parameter useful, least to say I wouldn’t be happy reporting to a concn. <LOD (or <LLOQ)!
…Changing tac briefly from PSA to high sensitivity cTn and use of the LOD for ACS r/o. This perhaps represents somewhat of a paradigm shift as regards testing and reporting in general terms however is it more
acceptable/palatable to report to the LOD for hs-cTn because it’s in the guidelines and perhaps a larger body of (robust) evidence supporting its use compared to that available re. use of PSA’s LOD for monitoring biochem. recurrence?...same/similar issues
of quality control/assurance though to contend with in both circumstances? (Australian report noted earlier from mailbase..chilling!).
KR, Graham
Dr Graham Lee PhD FRCPath
Consultant Clinical Biochemist/UCD Assistant Clinical Professor
Department of Clinical Biochemistry & Diagnostic Endocrinology
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital and
Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital, Dublin
Midland Regional Hospital, Mullingar, University College Dublin
Address: MMUH, Eccles St, Dublin 7
Tel:00353
1 8034983
From: Clinical
biochemistry discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Mustafa Serteser
Sent: 03 July 2018 10:37
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Reporting of low level Total PSA results
Dear Colleagues,
Is it possible for lower detection limit to be less than LoB?
According to EP17A; “lower limit of detection” also stands for LoD. It will also be the case that, LoB<LoD£LoQ.
I think, first this discrepancies on Roche PSA assay characterisics must be solved/corrected.
Regards.
From: Clinical biochemistry discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Lynch Mark - Consultant
Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 2:04 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Reporting of low level Total PSA results
This e-mail is covered by the disclaimer found at the end of the message.
Dear Colleagues
Our lab uses the Roche Total PSA assay (04491734190) and the kit insert states the following with respect to Limits and ranges [CLSI EP17-A]:
Measuring range 0.003 – 100 ng/mL
Lower detection Limit 0.003 ng/mL
Limit of Blank 0.006 ng/mL
Limit of Detection 0.014 ng/mL
At present we report our Total PSAs to one decimal place and report any results less than 0.1 as <0.1 ug/L.
[Our lowest IQC (BioRad Lyphochek) has a target value of 0.1 and runs with a CV of just under 6%]
We are getting an increasing number of requests to report down to much lower values.
I was wondering what other Roche users report down to? And indeed what users of other assays do?
Regards
Mark Lynch
Altnagelvin Hospital
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Trust or organisation it was sent from.
If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this email in error please contact the sender.
The content of this e-mail and any attachments or replies may be subject to public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, unless legally exempt.
------ACB discussion List Information-------- This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical community working in clinical
biochemistry. Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and they are responsible for all message content. ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
Green Laboratories Work http://www.laboratorymedicine.nhs.uk
List Archives http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.) http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/
------ACB discussion List Information-------- This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and they are responsible for all message content. ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk Green Laboratories Work
http://www.laboratorymedicine.nhs.uk List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/