Thanks Giorgos, but I definitely do not agree. Peer-review is one component of the work we do as researchers/scholars - which should be paid by our institutions. Why should this particular component of our work be paid separatedly? There are other activities that result in profit for others that are not paid: what about writing? The problem is that we still publish with for-profit journals, though there is no reason whatsoever at this point of history. Dealing with the issue by further commodifying the publication process is going in the exact opposite direction as the one we should advocate...--2018-05-28 10:01 GMT+01:00 Giorgos <[log in to unmask]>:I signed this petition started by a friend:https://chn.ge/2wEgN5qI think is a very reasonable demand.-------Simone TulumelloPost-doc research fellow, ULisboa, Instituto de Ciências Sociaislatest publications:Tulumello S (2017) Fear, Space and Urban Planning. Springer (link) / Tulumello S (2017) The multi-scalar nature of urban security and public safety. Urban Affairs Review (link) / Tulumello S Healey P (2016) Questioning planning, connecting places and times. plaNext special issue (link) / Tulumello S (2018) Neoliberalisation of Security, Austerity and the ‘End of Public Policy’ ACME (link)