Print

Print


Both Zukofsky and Olson, who I've just been reading, link the image to
"nouns" that don't do violence to each other / "out plus in" as the proper
noun. So I'm really sympathetic to your analysis, cheers,

Luke

On 3 May 2018 at 14:21, Jamie McKendrick <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Michael, thanks - honoured to be included. As you’ll have guessed the
> counter example wasn’t offered so much to refute the thesis as to
> complicate things.
>    Anecdote is always used negatively in relation to poetry. I can sort of
> see why, though it makes me bridle a bit. But your point about the range of
> tenses with regard to narrative is a crucial one, I think. And there’s much
> else of interest.
>     (Oddly enough, I began to pay attention to the elided form (he’d etc.)
> in relation to prose. For the first novel I translated, I had an (otherwise
> good) copyeditor who spent an inordinate amount of time weeding out these
> elisions. So a bothersome slow negotiation had to take place where I
> conceded a few and defended the many. It left me with a residual
> nervousness about the form, which I’m still not quite free of. It’s never
> loomed up in that way in writing a poem where the right form never seems in
> doubt.)
>
> Jamie
>
> > On 3 May 2018, at 13:25, [log in to unmask] <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > http://michaelpeverett.blogspot.co.uk/2018/05/the-verb.html
> >
> >
> > A follow-up, still very much a speculative draft, to last summer's piece
> about the word "I'd" .
> >
> > It takes in some of the subsequent discussion here: Jamie McK gets a
> namecheck.
> >
> >
> > Michael
>