 |
 |
> all that is ordinary and pleasant Oh and that does sound vile; who would shackle human spirit so Luke On 30 May 2018 at 16:38, Luke <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hm, I'm not well educated, which I'm trying to fix. Not sure what "using > certain words without the correct experience of their usage" or "ordinary > communicative language" has got to do with that. > > Ugly as well as stupid? > > On 30 May 2018 at 16:19, Tim Allen <0000002899e7d020-dmarc- > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Wanted to respond to this but waited to see if Luke would, which he has. >> How can Peter know what vocabulary Luke has or has not? And the snobbish >> implication seems to be that Luke is using certain words without the >> correct experience of their usage, or something like that.. i.e. he is >> being pretentious. I don't think this is so. I enjoy Luke's form of >> intellectual shorthand - it's provocative and always interesting - both >> light and heavy at the same time. >> >> Cheers >> >> Tim >> >> On 30 May 2018, at 00:31, Peter Riley wrote: >> >> Have you thought of studying poetry without any recourse to vocabulary >> beyond it except your own? >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> To unsubscribe from the BRITISH-IRISH-POETS list, click the following >> link: >> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=BRITISH- >> IRISH-POETS&A=1 >> > > To unsubscribe from the BRITISH-IRISH-POETS list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=BRITISH-IRISH-POETS&A=1