Greetings Open
Education Friends,
UNESCO is drafting an Open Educational
Resources (OER) Recommendation. This is an official UNESCO instrument that will
both advise national governments on how to support open education in their
countries and report on those efforts.
The draft
Recommendation text has been prepared by a group of open education experts from
UNESCO, researchers and practitioners from all world regions. The OER
Recommendation builds on the Ljubljana OER Action Plan, a product of the 2nd
World OER Congress.
The online consultation process is now
open. This is an invitation to
contribute to the draft. In addition to providing your own comments, please
share this opportunity through your networks.
The text is available
in English and French:
The deadline for
submission of contributions is: 1 June, 2018.
----------
Note: Some of us have discussed taking this opportunity to update the UNESCO OER definition. If you agree with this recommended edit, please include it in
your comments. I have included detailed* rationale for the edits below.
- Existing
UNESCO OER definition:
- Open Educational Resources (OERs) are teaching,
learning and research materials in any medium – digital or otherwise – that
reside in the public domain or have been released under an open license that
permits no-cost access, use, adaptation and redistribution by others with no or
limited restrictions.
- Proposed
updated UNESCO OER definition:
- Open Educational Resources (OER) are teaching,
learning and research materials in any medium that reside in the public domain
or have been released under an open license that permits no-cost access, use,
adaptation and redistribution by others.
----------
With gratitude,
Cable
Cable Green, PhD
Director of Open Education
Creative Commons
----------
* Details re: suggested changes to the UNESCO
OER definition:
(1) Change (OERs) to (OER)
- reason: OER is both singular and plural.
(2) remove: "– digital or otherwise –"
- reason: "digital or otherwise" is redundant with “in any medium”. "Any medium" means: text,
digital or other formats.
(3) remove: "with no or limited restrictions"
- reasons:
- Because
all open licenses come with some kind of restriction (e.g., the requirement to
provide attribution); "limited restrictions" is redundant with
"open license."
- OER in the public domain has no restrictions. Because the definition
says "public domain" - it is redundant to say "no
restrictions."
- In
addition to being redundant, the phrase "limited restrictions"
implies an author might add additional, custom license restrictions on her/his
OER. This is not helpful messaging when the education community is best served by
using standard, interoperable (not custom) open licenses.