in the NY Times, suggesting they are purveyors of fake news, and are preventing patients from getting a highly beneficial drug

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/26/health/stroke-clot-buster.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/26/insider/medical-tip-stroke-tpa.html

I haven't reviewed this data for a long time, but do vaguely remember that there is some evidence of somewhat better functional outcomes, but the trade-off is bleeding risk.  Kolata minimized bleeding risk in her story, suggesting that somehow it is going away.

So far, I haven't seen any pushback from the skeptics, so the story unopposed suggests once again the nasty pharma-scolds are preventing people from getting miraculous therapy.

Did I miss something?





--
Roy M. Poses MD FACP
President
Foundation for Integrity and Responsibility in Medicine (FIRM)
[log in to unmask]
Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine
Alpert Medical School, Brown University
[log in to unmask]

"He knew right then he was too far from home." - Bob Seger