 |
 |
I would like to join a hosting Bibo as well. --Stuart On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:56 AM, Sam Oh <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I am interested in this topic > > Sam > > On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 at 7:20 PM Paul Walk <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> [image: Boxbe] <https://www.boxbe.com/overview> This message is eligible >> for Automatic Cleanup! ([log in to unmask]) Add cleanup rule >> <https://www.boxbe.com/popup?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.boxbe.com%2Fcleanup%3Fkey%3DXiofJTXFZ6WMWd2tErIjHXcU1Hre88caCDEXqZsfPWg%253D%26token%3DX1CuL2jeb6GtD9aOaRd3OH3bFn9attqUBxcH3Ohu7x2eIDjMcjiIdPVSAEi0VHbTerpU7S69nGS05XwAkiJVLIr6JnLvtixOB%252BcyFHChe5CumOA9PyxxXauT1wdd%252FFYkeHmExTuyPJQ%253D&tc_serial=37511648896&tc_rand=754100825&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_CLEANUP_ADD&utm_content=001> >> | More info >> <http://blog.boxbe.com/general/boxbe-automatic-cleanup?tc_serial=37511648896&tc_rand=754100825&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_CLEANUP_ADD&utm_content=001> >> Hi Adrian, >> this is an interesting proposition. Rather than discussing this on the >> architecture forum, perhaps we could have a conversation about this? >> >> If anyone here is interested in joining that conversation, please let me >> know directly ([log in to unmask]) and I’ll set up a group call. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Paul >> >> > On 15 Mar 2018, at 08:58, Adrian Pohl <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> > >> > Hello, >> > >> > the Bibliographic Ontology (Bibo) has been down for several weeks now. >> As this is the second time in two years that the ontology is not available >> for some time, I think it would be best to give hosting of this ontology >> into the hands of a more stable organization. I couldn't think of a better >> fit than DCMI. I asked on the Bibo mailing list whether it would be ok for >> the creators to let DCMI take over Bibo hosting and they would be ok with >> it. >> > >> > Now the question is whether DCMI is actually interested in taking over >> Bibo hosting. Bibo has been an important ontology for representing >> bibliographic data in RDF for quite some time. Over time, it got more and >> more competition by ontologies from the library world (RDA, Bibframe etc.) >> and schema.org. Anyway, it is still used in several data sets (e.g. >> several bibliographic data sets from German library service centers). Also, >> it is already linked to DC terms, e.g. in specializing some of its >> properties (e.g. dct:contributor). >> > >> > What do you think about taking over the hosting? Is this something DCMI >> could do? >> > >> > All the best >> > Adrian >> >> ------------------------------------------- >> Paul Walk >> http://www.paulwalk.net >> >> Managing Director, DCMI >> http://www.dublincore.org >> >> Director, Antleaf Ltd >> http://www.antleaf.com >> ------------------------------------------- >> > -- > Sent from Gmail Mobile > -- Stuart A. Sutton, Metadata Consultant Associate Professor Emeritus, University of Washington Information School Email: [log in to unmask] Skype: sasutton