Picking this up late while systems are down.
Disagreeing with some previous comments - Candy Crush actually suggests manager is wrong as it clearly references data "that has not been derived from the records". Suggesting if it was Judge is happy it can be a DP braech.
This is common sense. Ultimately I suggest it depends on the facts in each case.E.g.
1. Nurse walking through ward sees celebrity X having an enema. Tweets about it. Breach of confidence but no DP breach -not derived from hospital records.
2. Nurse walking through ward sees celebrity X alcohol readings, Tweets about it. Breach of confidence and DP breach.
3. Nurse remembers something she read in records of celebrity X 10 years ago. Hospital no longer has any records. Nurse Tweets about it. Breach of confidence but no DP breach.
Somewhere between 2 and 3 an undefinable line is crossed.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/subscribers/subscribercommands.html
Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
