Hi Liam and FSL's experts,I would much appreciate if you could tell me if the following design is fine taking into account I have two groups of 6 participants every one with pre-post scanners and I would like to see if there are differences between the groups along the time and if there is any interaction.Best,Rosie2018-02-07 15:17 GMT+01:00 Rosalia Dacosta Aguayo <[log in to unmask]>:Hi Liam,I see, thank you very much for your help.Best regards,Rosalia2018-02-07 15:10 GMT+01:00 Nestor, Liam J <[log in to unmask]>:I think this might suit your data better Rosalia:
Liam.
From: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Rosalia Dacosta Aguayo
Sent: 07 February 2018 13:34
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [FSL] ANOVA 2 factors 2 levels (repeated measures) or ANOVA 2*2?
Dear FSL experts,
I have two group of participants that have been scanned in two different time points (basal, post-treatment).
I have been looking at FEAT: https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl
/fslwiki/FEAT/UserGuide#ANOVA: _1-factor_4-levels_.28Repeated _Measures.29
I wonder if this design would be the best (adapting it to my case):
ANOVA: 1-factor 4-levels (Repeated Measures) --> ANOVA 2-factor 2-levels?
Best regards,
Rosalia