Print

Print


Dear Moises,

What do you think about following GPU?

NVIDIA TESLA K10  Dual GPU B3M66A 688982-001

Do you think it would be okay to order it with the configuration I
mentioned in my previous email ? or would you suggest another GPU of Tesla
Family?

I just need your confirmation before we make a big investment in our
computation power.

Many Thanks,

Best, Wu


On 16 February 2018 at 12:56, Wu chen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dear Moises,
>
> I have one quick follow-up question.
>
> I have read about multi GPU and it requires SGE. Does SGE comes with GPU
> or I have to order it with multi GPU machine? LIke you suggested, we are
> thinking to order two of the tesla Family GPUs but I am not sure about SGE.
> Could you tell me if it comes with CentOS?
>
> Many thanks once again.
>
>
>
> On 16 February 2018 at 12:47, Wu chen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks alot Moises for your valuable comments and your precious time. I
>> really appreciate it.
>>
>> Best, Wu
>>
>> On 15 February 2018 at 16:54, Moises Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Wu.
>>>
>>> 1) Do you think above mentioned CPUs  and GPUs would be able to run CUDA
>>> and BEDPOSTX ? Is it appropriate or should we look for some other
>>> configuration?
>>>
>>> Yes, it will work, but I do not recommend Quadro GPUs They are expensive
>>> and the performance is not so great as Tesla, specially in double
>>> precission.
>>> I prefer Tesla family, and if not possible, GeForce (not as good
>>> performance as Tesla but more affordable than Quadro).
>>>
>>>  2) Do you think it is better to have 2 CPUs for and 2 GPUs for
>>> quickers image pre-processing? or there is as such no difference in the
>>> results when compared to ony one CPU and one GPU.
>>>
>>> Each GPU needs one CPU core, and each of these processors has 10 cores?.
>>> So, one processor is enough, although you still can use the rest of CPU
>>> cores for running other tasks in parallel.
>>> I am not sure about memory buses (for copying data CPU <-> GPU). Take a
>>> look to the configuration, PCIexpress, NVLINK...
>>> In any case, bedpostx does not need to copy much data... so this is not
>>> a problem if these transfers happens sequentially.
>>>
>>> 3 & 4) Yes, UbuntuOS is ok for bedpostx_gpu, however, if you want to
>>> make things easier when installing FSL, use CentOS (used forFSL
>>> distribution)
>>>
>>> Moises.
>>>
>>> On 15 February 2018 at 10:22, Wu chen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear FSL Users and Experts,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We are thinking to order following configuration for CUDA
>>>> implementation and I have some questions related to it.
>>>>
>>>> First Processor
>>>>
>>>> -Xeon E5-2630V4 2.2Ghz 20MB Turbo Boost (S26361-F5001-E220)
>>>>
>>>> Second Processor
>>>>
>>>>                 -2ND XEON E5-2630V4 (S26361-F5002-E230)
>>>>
>>>> RAM
>>>>
>>>> -16 x 16 GB = 256GB RAM
>>>>
>>>> HDD SATA III
>>>>
>>>>                  -2TB x 2 = 4TB
>>>>
>>>> First Graphics Card
>>>>
>>>>                   -NVIDIA QUADRO M5000 8GB ( S26361-F2222-E593 )
>>>>
>>>> Second Graphics Card
>>>>                  -NVIDIA QUADRO M5000 8GB (S26361-F2222-E990)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1) Do you think above mentioned CPUs  and GPUs would be able to run
>>>> CUDA and BEDPOSTX ? Is it appropriate or should we look for some other
>>>> configuration? Please suggest a configuration if you disagree with our
>>>> configuration.
>>>>
>>>> 2) Do you think it is better to have 2 CPUs for and 2 GPUs for quickers
>>>> image pre-processing? or there is as such no difference in the results when
>>>> compared to ony one CPU and one GPU
>>>>
>>>> 3) Which CentoOS version and CUDA version would you suggest to install
>>>> on the above configuration?
>>>>
>>>> 4) Can we run CUDA implementation on UbuntuOS?
>>>>
>>>> I really appreciate your time and efforts for making our lab more
>>>> faster and more powerful.
>>>>
>>>> Many Thanks
>>>> Best, Wu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>