 |
 |
Summary of discussions 1) the session agenda document with collaborative comments can be found at https://docs.google.com/document/d/12US8CxI1GHt7txQrZhnyXhdt-jQeksReoXB6ipb5m9s/edit# 2) there was much discussion on the original list of accessibility criteria. The key themes that emerged were: * we have to audit things that are within the control of those being audited therefore aggregators may have a different audit form from publishers that is focused more on their interface and their guidance rather than the (possibly very variable) accessibility of their content. * whilst there may be many nuances in the data we want to collect it is important to keep the audit checklist as simple and manageable as possible. 3) The people with responsibility for accessibility may not have the authority within the organisation to improve the guidance available. We can support them by providing a briefing for senior managers and marketing personnel. 4) There are potentially a range of places where the accessibility information could exist. These include LibGuides, the supplier's website or the platform itself. It was generally felt that, wherever possible, having the information available within the platform would provide best barrier-free access. 5) there was discussion about the feasibility of having links to the publishers accessibility guidance embedded in the meta data available on aggregator platforms. This way, a student experiencing difficulty would be able to have a direct link to the best available advice for the product they are reading. Next steps 1) Sign up for next session - Reality Check (exploring the different headings proposed and identifying the relative ease of implementation and the range of 'scorability' for different requirements). Please give your availability on the Doodle poll so we can get best attendance. https://doodle.com/poll/n8xrgzsay956hxn9 2) volunteer to support one of the follow up actions: 1. a briefing for senior managers/marketing managers. 2. the first draft of the audit questions by commenting on this document or copying, pasting the initial proposal further down the document and radically changing it to an alternative suggestion. Please provide your name with all suggestions/amendments and improvements so we know who to approach for questions, clarification or congratulation! https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LJCxBW6IX2tM8Dxei6FdnGgeRZdxGxt0rFfmcajxaDE/edit?usp=sharing Summary of actions: Fill in the doodle poll for next meeting<https://doodle.com/poll/n8xrgzsay956hxn9> Check, comment on or improve the first pass at the criteria<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LJCxBW6IX2tM8Dxei6FdnGgeRZdxGxt0rFfmcajxaDE/edit?usp=sharing> If you're happy to start on a briefing for senior executives please let me know / fill in your name on the summary notes<https://docs.google.com/document/d/12US8CxI1GHt7txQrZhnyXhdt-jQeksReoXB6ipb5m9s/edit> Have a great weekend all Alistair [Jisc]<http://www.jisc.ac.uk/> Alistair McNaught Subject specialist (accessibility and inclusion) M 07443 984111 Skype alistair_techdis Skype for Business [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> Twitter @alistairm One Castlepark, Tower hill, Bristol, BS2 oJA jisc.ac.uk<http://www.jisc.ac.uk/> Please note: I use Voice Recognition which occasionally results in misinterpreted words. Apologies if I failed to spot any. Jisc is a registered charity (number 1149740) and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under Company No. 5747339, VAT No. GB 197 0632 86. Jisc’s registered office is: One Castlepark, Tower Hill, Bristol, BS2 0JA. T 0203 697 5800. Jisc Services Limited is a wholly owned Jisc subsidiary and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under company number 2881024, VAT number GB 197 0632 86. The registered office is: One Castle Park, Tower Hill, Bristol BS2 0JA. T 0203 697 5800.