A few days to normalise over 1000 subjects is not an especially long time. I'd suggest trying to figure out what went wrong and running things again.  If you used the T1w to drive the spatial normalisation, then check that these are in good alignment with the fMRI (Check Reg button).  My own experience of the ABIDE dataset is that they are pretty messy, with a lot of cereballa cut off some of the positioning information a bit unreliable.  Most of the T1w images can be normalised pretty easily though, so success is likely to depend on how accurately the T1w can be aligned with the fMRI.

Best regards,
-John



On 19 December 2017 at 12:11, Mavis Gezimati <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Thank you for responding Prof

Can I successfully use those normalised for spDCM (will they not compromise the analysis?) or I should redo the preprocessing / normalisation?

Regards
Mavis

On Dec 19, 2017 17:10, "John Ashburner" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
These normalisations don't seem particularly accurate.  I'm not sure what went wrong.

Best regards,
-John


On 19 December 2017 at 11:05, Mavis Gezimati <[log in to unmask]> wrote:



Dear SPM community


May you kindly check my reAlignment and Normalisation output whether they are correct. Iam mostly having doubt on the translation and rotation value ranges. I have attached the output screenshots and I have used the batch editor.

Sorry seems the attachment was missing in my previous mail.

May you kindly assist and advise.

Regards

Mavis 




--
Prof John Ashburner
Professor of Imaging Science
UCL Institute of Neurology
Queen Square
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging
University College London
12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG
E: [log in to unmask]  T: +44 (0)20 3448 4365
http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/



--
Prof John Ashburner
Professor of Imaging Science
UCL Institute of Neurology
Queen Square
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging
University College London
12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG
E: [log in to unmask]  T: +44 (0)20 3448 4365
http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/