 |
 |
Dear Stefan, Just a couple of thoughts: - first of all I think that Gerard is absolutely right, it would have been nice to raise such issues first with the developers. In my experience, Staraniso does a fantastic job if used correctly. - but if you're OK with public trials, may I ask: why on Earth would anybody need ContaMiner? Are you trying to offer some sort of computational cure for sloppy biochemistry? There is zero point in crystallizing crap samples, sorry to say this. In my 17 or so years in Strubi I've never heard of anybody crystallizing a "contaminant", being it a purification tag or whatever. I suppose this might have happened to somebody you know, hence the motivation to spend time on the bizarre ContaMiner. Which is a pity, a silly outcome would only teach people to do their job (or train their robots) properly. Best wishes, Radu -- Radu Aricescu MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Francis Crick Avenue Cambridge Biomedical Campus Cambridge CB2 0QH, U.K. tel: +44-(0)1223-267049 fax: +44-(0)1223-268305 www: http://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/group-leaders/a-to-g/radu-aricescu > Dear Stefan, > > Regarding your final paragraph: your server carries a warning > with the exact wording: > > "Submitting StarAniso files can give you suspicious results. Use > with care!" > > It seems rather regrettable that you are posting such a public > warning without ever having contacted the STARANISO developers about > your observations, nor giving any information about what you call > "suspicious" or what the "care" you recommend would consist of. > > We have taken a great deal of care ourselves in developing the > program and offering it to the community through a server, and the > least we would have expected is that any pattern of "suspicious" > results would be referred to us so that we could investigate them. > There may be some assumptions made in MoRDa that we are not aware of, > that might be incompatible with assumptions made in STARANISO - who > knows? Or it could be that some particularly badly collected datasets > are made to look worse after their anisotropy analysis. > > Could we discuss your observations, and what it is exactly that > you call "suspicious", before they end up being referred to in such an > uninformative manner as some sort of "Government Health Warning"? > > I think that would be nice :-) and we would be only too keen to > take whatever extra "care" is needed ourselves. We would all learn > something. > > > With best wishes, > > Gerard. > > (on behalf of the STARANISO developers) > > -- > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 05:02:39PM +0100, Stefan Arold wrote: >> Dear Community, >> >> A quick message to announce the following two new features on our >> ContaMiner web server for the automated detection of unwantedly >> crystallised contaminants ( >> https://strube.cbrc.kaust.edu.sa/contaminer/submit) >> >> 1) online visualisation of 2FoFc and FoFc maps. In cases of positive >> results, the ‘UglyMol’ tab allows to inspect 2FoFc and FoFc maps >> directly >> in the web browser. Thi >> >> 2) life-update. Previously, results were sent to you once all ~2000 MR jobs >> were finished. Now, the individual results for each potential contaminant >> will appear as soon as they are finished. This feature should substantially >> shorten the time for identifying positive results (i.e. contaminant >> detected), which are terminated faster than negative ones. >> >> 3) custom contaminants. In the ‘Advanced’ tab, users can upload own PDB >> files (more than one is possible) to be included as search models. This >> feature can be used to include PDB files from your lab bench neighbour’s >> project to test for potential lab internal contaminations (through >> bacterial contamination or through mix-up of plasmids or glycerol stocks). >> This feature could also be ‘abused’ as a means to use the MoRDa pipeline >> to >> run molecular replacements with template structures that are not yet >> deposited in the PDB; for example to run molecular replacement and initial >> refinement for liganded or complexed versions of an unpublished structure. >> This might be particularly interesting for crystallographers away from >> their usual home software environment (e.g. at the beamline). >> >> Finally, a word of warning – Staraniso files might give false positives if >> they have large anisotropic cuts. >> >> Keep your crystals clean! >> >> With best wishes >> >> The ContaMiner Team > > -- > > =============================================================== > * * > * Gerard Bricogne [log in to unmask] * > * * > * Global Phasing Ltd. * > * Sheraton House, Castle Park Tel: +44-(0)1223-353033 * > * Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK Fax: +44-(0)1223-366889 * > * * > =============================================================== >