Print

Print


*Apologies for cross-posting*

*CALL FOR PAPERS*

AAG 2018 - April 10-14, New Orleans



*Engaging Southern Theory: Challenging Hierarchies of Knowledge & Place*



Amy Piedalue, Australia India Institute, University of Melbourne

Susmita Rishi, University of Washington, Seattle



In the last decade, critical scholars across the social sciences have
renewed critiques of geographic hierarchies of knowledge production, and
issued a variety of calls for a reexamination of power that questions “the
territory of thought itself” (Roy and Crane, 2015).  Several such
provocations aim to unsettle geographic imaginations of ‘the global south,’
and particularly to divest from the presumption that ‘the south’ produces
only raw data and never theory (Roy & Crane 2015; Roy 2016; Comaroff &
Comaroff 2012; Connell 2007). This session aims to extend this call for
deeper engagement with ‘theory from the south,’ while simultaneously
dislodging fixed geographic notions of ‘north and south’, ‘east and west’. This
requires “… *a departure from the usual business of intellectual
extraction, whereby colonized places and peoples become objectified sources
of ‘raw data’. We suggest instead that our imperial present and the
histories it calls forth might be better interrogated through [a
re-positioning of ‘south’ that] draws attention to power and inequality
(rather than reproducing colonial geographic hierarchies of ‘civility’ or
modernity). As such, ‘southern theory’ must be charted not onto the
colonial maps we’ve inherited, but rather through a process of
counter-mapping that values the insights and theories that emerge from
positions of struggle and marginality*” (Piedalue & Rishi, forthcoming). In
this way, ‘southern theory’ might better centralize the operation of power
through and in knowledge regimes by instead “view[ing] ‘south’ as a
flexible and mobile marker that draws our gaze to the operation of imperial
power, manifest in complex inequalities articulated at local and global
scales” (Piedalue & Rishi, forthcoming).

In this session, we seek to open a conversation that showcases forms of
‘southern theory,’ which build such theoretical interventions through
grounded empirical research and examples. We also recognize and emphasize
the importance of learning from theory/knowledge-making that already enacts
such a critical ‘southern theory’ approach, including by rejecting white
settler, colonial, and imperial geographic imaginaries - such as
theoretical interventions made by postcolonial, decolonial and critical
race feminisms and/or through centering Indigenous ontologies (i.e. Smith,
L.T. 2012; Sandoval 2000; Mohanty 2003; McKitttrick 2006; McKittrick and
Woods 2007; Hunt 2013, 2014; Abu-Lughod 2013; Goeman 2013; Lowe 2015;
Moreton-Robinson 2015). We envision this conversation to take place in two
parts, first as a traditional paper session, then followed by a discussion
session. We are interested in empirically-rich research that engages with
existing bodies of theory and knowledge produced in ‘the south’, or draws
upon feminist and action research partnerships to showcase theoretical
insights emerging from commonly marginalized sites of social life,
political struggle, and/or economic survival.

For both the paper session and the discussion session, we ask you to send
us an abstract of the requisite 250 words. Please be sure to indicate in
your email whether you want to be part of the paper or discussion session
or both. Please send abstracts to Amy Piedalue ([log in to unmask])
and Susmita Rishi ([log in to unmask]) by *Friday, October 20th. *We
will be in touch by Mon. Oct. 23rd and will need AAG PINs from participants
by Wed. Oct 25th.



References:

Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2013. *Do Muslim Women Need Saving?* Cambridge,
Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Comaroff, Jean, and John L. Comaroff. 2012. *Theory from the South: Or, How
Euro-America Is Evolving toward Africa*. Boulder, Colo.: Paradigm
Publishers.

Connell, Raewyn. 2007. *Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge
in Social Science*. Cambridge: Polity, 2007.

Goeman, Mishuana. 2013. *Mark My Words: Native Women Mapping Our Nations*.
Minneapolis: Univ Of Minnesota Press.

Hunt, Sarah. 2013. “Decolonizing Sex Work: Developing an Intersectional
Indigenous Approach.” In *Selling Sex: Experience, Advocacy, and Research
on Sex Work in Canada*, edited by Emily Van der Meulen, Elya M Durisin, and
Victoria Love.

Hunt, Sarah. 2014. “Ontologies of Indigeneity: The Politics of Embodying a
Concept.” *Cultural Geographies* 21 (1): 27–32.

Lowe, Lisa. 2015. *The Intimacies of Four Continents*. Durham: Duke
University Press Books.

McKittrick, Katherine. 2006. *Demonic Grounds: Black Women and the
Cartographies of Struggle*. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

McKittrick, Katherine, and Clyde Adrian Woods. 2007. *Black Geographies and
the Politics of Place*. Toronto, Ont.; Cambridge, Mass.: Between the Lines;
South End Press.
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2003. *Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing
Theory, Practicing Solidarity*. Durham; London: Duke University Press.

Moreton-Robinson, Aileen. 2015. *The White Possessive: Property, Power, and
Indigenous Sovereignty*. Indigenous Americas. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press, 2015.

Roy, Ananya. 2016. “Who’s Afraid of Postcolonial Theory?” *International
Journal of Urban & Regional Research* 40 (1): 200–209.

Roy, Ananya, and Emma Shaw Crane. 2015. *Territories of Poverty Rethinking
North and South*. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

Sandoval, Chela. 2000. *Methodology of the Oppressed*. Minneapolis, MN:
University of Minnesota Press.

Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 2012. *Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and
Indigenous Peoples*. 2nd edition. New York: Zed Books.