 |
 |
The ideas was to cut all datasets at say 30% CC1/2 to see how they differ in resolution I/sigI etc. for that given CC1/2 …
From:
Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Friday, 27. October 2017 at 23:12
To: "Schulz, Eike-Christian" <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] using CC1/2 to define resolution limit in Xscale
Do you mean the CC1/2 for the 15 merged data sets? Doesnt AIMLESS give you this - treat each one as a seperate run, and you get the stats for each run, as well as the overall result.
Then you can check where CC1/2 reaches your chosen limit..\
Eleanor
PS - not sure if it is an absolute criteria - it might depend to some extent on multiplicity..
On 27 October 2017 at 21:31, Schulz, Eike-Christian <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to compare > 15 datasets and would like to use a common CC1/2 value as an objective criterion to determine the resolution cut-off.
All data were integrated in XDS.
Is there a convenient way to apply this in XSCALE or in any of its alternatives?
With best regards,
Eike