OK all, in view of certain replies on CG - the replies have gone both ways here - it's gone up there (paper 0114) at http://fooddeserts.org/images/Paper0000.htm
Natrually with a strong 'academic health warning'.
Hopefully we can use this to debunk such views - the paper looks rather weak to me simply on its discussion or lack of, regarding comparative European governance issues - let alone its views on the Developing World.
Dr Hillary J. Shaw
Director and Senior Research Consultant
Shaw Food Solutions
Newport
Shropshire
TF10 8QE
www.fooddeserts.org
From: A forum for critical and radical geographers [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Hillary Shaw
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 4:55 AM
To: CRIT-GEOG-[log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: "The case for colonialism", outrage and response
That gves me a moral dilemma - I was going to post it on my foodeserts.org article archive - which wouldn't boost the metrics of the journal - for others to read
- but should I be publicising this article, (with, to put it mildly, serious flaws) up there at all? What does the rest of CG think?
Dr Hillary J. Shaw
Director and Senior Research Consultant
Shaw Food Solutions
Newport
Shropshire
TF10 8QE
www.fooddeserts.org
-----Original Message-----
From: ANDERSON, BEN <[log in to unmask]>
To: CRIT-GEOG-FORUM <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wed, Sep 13, 2017 10:40 am
Subject: "The case for colonialism", outrage and response
"As Farhana and others have said on twitter, I think it's really important that, if the article is read, it's done so in a way that doesn't increase the metrics of
the journal or the author. So we don't click on it, don't circulate it. "
Ben
