 |
 |
Dear Ameya, DipCheck uses a novel 3-dimensional parameter space for validation of the backbone geometry, and we hope that it can be more informative than some of the existing validation approaches. We also hope that DipCheck can be a good validation tool as its inverse task does not seem to be solvable - in other words the DipCheck parameter space cannot be used to better 'geometrise' a protein model. We are discussing with the PDB colleagues a possibility for DipCheck to join the PDB validation tools. With best regards, Victor On 04/09/2017 16:53, ameya benz wrote: > Dear Victor, > > I used the server. However I found that the % of residues in > disallowed region given by your server and PDB validation server > differs. What could be the probable reason? > > regards, > Ameya > > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Victor Lamzin <[log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: > > > Dear Colleagues, > > We announce the DipCheck Webservice for validation of backbone > geometry in protein structures as described in: > https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252517008466 > <https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252517008466> > > The Webservice is available at: > http://cluster.embl-hamburg.de/dipcheck > <http://cluster.embl-hamburg.de/dipcheck> > > Joana Pereira, Umut Oezugurel, Philipp Heuser and Victor Lamzin > >