Appreciate the replies. Friendly list!

Cheers,
Luke

On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Luke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Quite possibly this means there’s something wrong with me. 

I have a copy of Abyss, from 2016, and thought it was about dying, though I haven't read it yet.

Cheers,

Luke

On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Peter Riley <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
It seems to be the best term for my experience in attempting to read some of the latest texts. It’s like being hit in the face with an inflated bladder.  A shock, and then nothing happens whatsoever.  I don’t continue to the end because what is the point of duplicating nothing or inviting more bladders.   Quite possibly this means there’s something wrong with me. 
p


On 10 Sep 2017, at 3:56 pm, Tim Allen <0000002899e7d020-dmarc-reques[log in to unmask]> wrote:

What does Peter mean by 'unreadable'? Unreadable can mean one of many things so which one is Peter's?

I appear to derive great pleasure from early Prynne's 'evasive kind of awkwardness' so I therefore value it. Is there something wrong with me?